Show simple item record

dc.creator
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-05T16:04:36Z
dc.date.available2020-11-05T16:04:36Z
dc.date.created1982-11-05
dc.date.issued
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationUnited States v. Belfield, 692 F.2d 141 (D.C. Cir. 1982)en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc81-2152
dc.identifier.govdoc81-2155
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description[MD] ###Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law The Court found that the district court’s ex parte in camera review determining the legality of the surveillance and not requiring disclosure to defendant was in keeping with the enacted FISA procedures. 692 F.2d at 147. The Court also held that not requiring disclosure and an adversary hearing did not violate the defendant’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. Id. at 148-49. ####View document: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18353263750616420966&q=692+F.2d+141+&hl=en&as_sdt=20000006en_US
dc.formaten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuiten_US
dc.subjectUnited States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit)en_US
dc.titleUnited States v. Belfielden_US
dc.typeRecord (document)en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record