Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of the FISC Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L.
Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law
The Court declined to entertain the ACLU’s petition to revisit the Court’s decision in GID.CA.00013, holding that it "is unpersuaded that the Movant has shown cause as to why this Court has jurisdiction to consider its current claims.” Id. at 2. The Court also finds that this case does not present a question of law to bring before the Supreme Court. Id. at 3. GID.C.00285 is affirmed and the movant’s petition is dismissed. Id.
Files in this item
Creator
Sentelle, David B.
Bibliographic Citation
Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of the FISC Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L., No. FISCR Misc. 20-02, GID.CA.00015 (FISA Ct. Rev. Nov. 19, 2020) (Sentelle, J.)
Permanent Link
https://perma.cc/Q9K2-33MGhttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/1060601
Date
2020-11-19Type
Publisher
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review
Declassification Date
2020-11-20Identifier
GID.CA.00015Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Order to Show Cause, In re Ops. & Ords. of the FISC Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L.
Sentelle, David B. (United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, 2020-10-16)