Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of the FISC Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L.

dc.creator	Sentelle, David B.
dc.date.accessioned	2020-11-23T14:23:36Z
dc.date.available	2020-11-23T14:23:36Z
dc.date.created	2020-11-19
dc.date.issued	2020-11-20
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation	Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of the FISC Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L., No. FISCR Misc. 20-02, GID.CA.00015 (FISA Ct. Rev. Nov. 19, 2020) (Sentelle, J.)	en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc	FISCR Misc. 20-02
dc.identifier.other	GID.CA.00015
dc.identifier.uri	https://perma.cc/Q9K2-33MG
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1060601
dc.description	[MD] ### Holding, Findings, and Matters of Law The Court declined to entertain the ACLU’s petition to revisit the Court’s decision in GID.CA.00013, holding that it "is unpersuaded that the Movant has shown cause as to why this Court has jurisdiction to consider its current claims.” Id. at 2. The Court also finds that this case does not present a question of law to bring before the Supreme Court. Id. at 3. GID.C.00285 is affirmed and the movant’s petition is dismissed. Id.	en_US
dc.format	1 pdf	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review	en_US
dc.subject	United States. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review	en_US
dc.title	Opinion and Order, In re Ops. & Ords. of the FISC Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of L.	en_US
dc.type	Record (document)	en_US
dc.description.alt	First page of document	en_US

Related items