Show simple item record

Files in this item

Cover for Argentine Federal Reforms of the Judiciary and the Judicial Delay of Corruption Cases: From the 35th Accord of 2003 to the Repentance Law of 2016
dc.contributor.advisorBeers, Daniel
dc.creator
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T19:15:57Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T19:15:57Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.date.issued
dc.date.submitted01/01/2020
dc.identifier.uri
dc.descriptionM.A.
dc.description.abstractThe researcher will focus the paper to answer the following research question: Why is the Argentine judiciary unable to resolve federal corruption cases?
dc.description.abstractThe research will evaluate different hypotheses such as judicial culture, political influence of the judiciary, public scrutiny theory and institutional causes engaging key stakeholders relevant to the subject matter.
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extent94 leaves
dc.languageen
dc.publisherGeorgetown University
dc.sourceGeorgetown University-Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
dc.sourceDevelopment Management & Policy Program
dc.subjectArgentina
dc.subjectCorruption
dc.subjectJudicial Culture
dc.subjectJudiciary
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.subjectReforms
dc.subject.lcshPublic policy
dc.subject.otherPublic policy
dc.titleArgentine Federal Reforms of the Judiciary and the Judicial Delay of Corruption Cases: From the 35th Accord of 2003 to the Repentance Law of 2016
dc.typethesis


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record