Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Articulating Non-Native Vowel Contrasts

    Cover for Articulating Non-Native Vowel Contrasts
    View/Open
    View/Open: Oakley_georgetown_0076D_15002.pdf (8.1MB) Bookview

    Creator
    Oakley, Madeleine
    Advisor
    Zsiga, Elizabeth
    Abstract
    The goal of this dissertation is to better understand the targets of vowels in speech production. Three experiments investigate vowel production in non-native speech, probing how new vowel categories, and thus targets, are formed. Three research questions are addressed:
     
    1) Do vowels have articulatory targets (as predicted by Browman & Goldstein (1989; 1990)), as opposed to acoustic targets (as predicted by Liljencrants & Lindblom (1972), Flemming (1996), and Stevens & Keyser (2010))?
     
    2) Do speakers re-use the articulatory gestures (as predicted by Best & Tyler (2007)) or acoustic targets (as predicted by Flege (1987; 2005)) from their native language to produce non-native phones? How does vowel quality, and similarity to the native language sounds, influence speakers’ production strategies?
     
    3) Do naïve speakers, who are hearing certain vowel contrasts for the first time, use different strategies than language learners, who have had more exposure to the language?
     
    The three experiments in this dissertation explore these questions by collecting acoustic, video and sonographic data on non-native vowel production, and are designed to look at situations where articulatory and acoustic theories make different predictions about vowel production.
     
    Experiment 1 examines how English speakers produce Akan vowels to which they have had no prior exposure. Akan vowels are acoustically similar to English vowels, and thus are predicted to be assimilated by English listeners to English categories, but are produced with different vocal tract configurations, using mostly the tongue root rather than tongue body (Tiede, 1996; Kirkham & Nance, 2017). Experiment 2 examines how Spanish speakers produce French front round vowels to which they have had no prior exposure. Because front round vowels are acoustically dissimilar from any Spanish vowels, they are predicted to fail to assimilate to any Spanish vowel category. Experiment 3 examines how native English speakers learning French (as opposed to naïve speakers) produce the vowels of French. For each experiment, the question is asked, do speakers produce the novel phones with the acoustic targets of the native language, the articulatory gestures of the native language, both, or neither?
     
    The results show a complex pattern of L1 transfer, with much individual variation and dependence on vowel quality. For both French and Akan, learners and naïve speakers were more likely to transfer both tongue position and acoustic target for the high vowels than for the mid vowels, with /i/ showing particular stability across speakers and languages, suggesting a special status for the “corner” vowels in both acoustics and articulation. For the front round vowels of French, both learners and naïve speakers transferred lip rounding gestures from the L1, but not tongue body or lip un-rounding gestures, suggesting a special status for a “round” feature or gesture. Across all three experiments, participants did not re-use native language categories for dissimilar phones, suggesting that different strategies are used for categorized and uncategorized “new” vowels. Overall, these results demonstrate that models of L2 category formation must reference both the articulatory gesture and the acoustic-phonetic category.
     
    Description
    Ph.D.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1062367
    Date Published
    2021
    Subject
    Linguistics; Linguistics;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    211 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for Comparing Native and Non-native Raters of US Federal Government Speaking Tests

      Comparing Native and Non-native Raters of US Federal Government Speaking Tests 

      Brooks, Rachel Lunde (Georgetown University, 2013)
      Previous Language Testing research has largely reported that although many raters' characteristics affect their evaluations of language assessments (Reed & Cohen, 2001), being a native speaker or non-native speaker rater ...
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility