Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • McCourt School of Public Policy
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Public Policy
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • McCourt School of Public Policy
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Public Policy
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of Universal Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs on State Test Scores in Georgia

    Cover for Effect of Universal Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs on State Test Scores in Georgia
    View/Open
    View/Open: Pipalia_georgetown_0076M_15072.pdf (564kB) Bookview

    Creator
    Pipalia, Jagir
    Advisor
    Morrison, Donna M
    Abstract
    Students' social-emotional abilities are associated with a variety of favorable life outcomes in several studies, including their academic success in the future (Payton et al., 2008). In addition to parents' contribution, children learn to cultivate empathy and understand others' desires and wishes through social and emotional learning (SEL) programs. There is widespread enthusiasm for introducing SEL programs in schools (CASEL, 2019); however, there is little evidence on the effect of universal SEL programs on students' academic success. Student's academic performance is assessed by state test results, which is a policy-relevant metric. Furthermore, state test results are readily accessible and appropriate for investigating the effect of universal SEL programming on student academic achievement.
     
    This paper investigates the connection between SEL programs in Georgia public schools and students' success on Georgia's state test, the Georgia Milestones Test. I merge Georgia Department of Education data on students in grades 3, 5, and 8 with survey data on the availability of universal SEL programming in a district to create my model. I compare the average test results of school districts that have adopted an SEL program to school districts that have not. Students' mean English and Math scores in Grades 3, 5, and 8 are the study's dependent variables. Schools with an SEL program have fewer low-income students, a higher proportion of Black students, more students enrolled, and outperform districts without an SEL program on the ACT.
     
    While the results do not provide statistical evidence to suggest that SEL programs have a significant effect on student's state test scores, it cannot be concluded that SEL programs have no impact on student achievement (Merrell et al., 2008). Prospective research on this issue would benefit from identifying a particular form of SEL program for the study, restricting the categories of programs considered. The qualitative components of each SEL program adopted in Georgia schools should be analyzed to determine which programs are expected to have an impact on test results, opening the way for a tailored quantitative analysis to estimate those programs' impact.
     
    Description
    M.P.P.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1062677
    Date Published
    2021
    Subject
    Georgia School District; Social Emotional Learning; State Test; Public policy; Public policy;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    59 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Public Policy
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for The Relationship Between State-funded Preschool Programs and National Standardized Test Scores in Math and Reading in Fourth Grade

      The Relationship Between State-funded Preschool Programs and National Standardized Test Scores in Math and Reading in Fourth Grade 

      Dieterle, Kevin Patrick (Georgetown University, 2012)
      While K-12 education is available universally across the United States, educational offerings for children prior to kindergarten entry are far more fragmented. States offer a wide variety of program structures: while some ...
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility