Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of History
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - History
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of History
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - History
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    "To Absent Us from Humanity:" Ainu and Population Counts under Russian and Japanese Administration

    Restricted Access
    View/Open
    View/Open: Hudson_georgetown_0076D_15115.pdf (11.MB)

    Creator
    Hudson, Chelsea Clare
    Advisor
    Sand, Jordan
    Abstract
    The historical homelands of Ainu, one of the Indigenous peoples of the Sea of Okhotsk region, are split between Russian and Japanese administration. Over the past two centuries, Russo- Japanese competition surrounding the islands we now call Hokkaido, Sakhalin, and the Kuril archipelago has had profound effects on Ainu populations, as the repeated redrawing of their territorial borders and revision of their legal status has uprooted entire communities. Today, Ainu descendants across the world may number in the hundreds of thousands, but the only state entity that tracks Ainu populations is the government of Hokkaido prefecture. The central Japanese government does not include an ethnicity category in its national census; the Russian government does not formally recognize the existence of Ainu at all.
     
    I argue that population counts played an instrumental role in Ainu administration under Japan, Russia, and the Soviet Union between the beginning of Russo-Japanese territorial tensions in the early 1800s and the aftermath of the Asia-Pacific War in the late 1940s. On a broad scale, Japanese officials relied on population surveys to reinforce the idea that Ainu would vanish as a people via their assimilation into the Japanese nation, their home islands transformed into extensions of the Japanese archipelago. Conversely, Russian officials’ conviction that Ainu were too closely aligned with Japan led to their marginalization in Russian censuses, culminating in their exclusion from the list of minorities of the Soviet Union in the 1930s.
     
    In determining the parameters of the census, state officials developed restrictive definitions of Ainu identity based on cultural stereotypes, inaccurate paper records, and even physical appearance that persisted well into the twentieth century. These preconceptions of who could and could not be counted as “Ainu” were at odds with the reality of Ainu lives, as Ainu communities living across the unstable Russo-Japanese border developed complex, overlapping senses of self and nationality that defied simple categorization. The long history winding toward their exclusion from the census in Russia and Japan mirrors the experiences of many Indigenous peoples who, much like Ainu, found themselves declared “dying races” even as they navigated their survival under colonial administration.
     
    Description
    Ph.D.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1063059
    Date Published
    2021
    Subject
    Ainu; Census; Japan; Okhotsk; Russia; Soviet; History; Asia -- History; Russia -- History; History; Asian history; Russian history;
    Type
    thesis
    Embargo Lift Date
    2024-02-02
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    481 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - History
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Recommendations for Implementation of Community Consultation and Public Disclosure Under the Food and Drug Administration's "Exception From Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research": A Special Report From the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative and Critical Care: Endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 

      Halperin, Henry; Paradis, Norman; Mosesso, Vincent Jr.; Nichol, Graham; Sayre, Michael; Ornato, Joseph P.; Gerardi, Michael; Nadkarni, Vinay M.; Berg, Robert; Becker, Lance; Siegler, Mark; Collins, Megan; Cairns, Charles B.; Biros, Michelle H.; Vanden Hoek, Terry; Peberdy, Mary Ann (2007-10-16)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility