Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown University Medical Center
    • Biomedical Graduate Education
    • Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown University Medical Center
    • Biomedical Graduate Education
    • Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Causal Inference for Measures of Health Disparities

    Cover for Causal Inference for Measures of Health Disparities
    View/Open
    View/Open: Li_georgetown_0076D_15231.pdf (543kB) Bookview

    Creator
    Li, Tengfei
    Advisor
    Luta, George
    ORCID
    0000-0002-5026-1773
    Abstract
    There is increased interest in the evaluation of health disparities between different socioeconomic groups using data from observational studies. However, in the absence of randomization, the results and conclusions may be limited to associations rather than causal effects. The causal inference framework allows us to estimate causal measures for such situations. Using generalized propensity scores, we introduce inverse probability weighting (IPW), doubly-robust (DR) and covariate-adjustment (CA) estimators for the vector of the marginal means of the distributions of the potential outcomes corresponding to multiple socioeconomic groups. We estimate the variance of the IPW, DR and CA estimators using an M-estimation approach. The variances of the estimators for the causal measures of health disparities are subsequently estimated using the multivariate delta method, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are constructed accordingly. A bootstrap method to construct the 95% CIs is also considered for comparison purposes. In simulation studies, the 95% CIs based on the analytical method had empirical coverage probabilities close to the nominal level and had advantages over the bootstrap-based 95% CIs under certain scenarios. We illustrate the proposed methods using a real data set from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.
    Description
    Ph.D.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/1064582
    Date Published
    2022
    Subject
    bootstrap; generalized propensity score; health disparities; M-estimation; Biometry; Biostatistics;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    124 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Class Matters: U.S. Versus U.K. Measures of Occupational Disparities in Access to Health Services and Health Status in the 2000 U.S. National Health Interview Survey 

      Krieger, Nancy; Barbeau, Elizabeth M.; Soobader, Mah-Jabeen (2005)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility