Show simple item record

dc.creatorJavitt, Gail H.en
dc.creatorStanley, Ericaen
dc.creatorHudson, Kathyen
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-12T18:17:43Zen
dc.date.available2011-07-12T18:17:43Zen
dc.date.created2004-06en
dc.date.issued2004-06en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationOklahoma Law Review 2004 Summer; 57(2): 251-302en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/504864en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageengen
dc.source273318en
dc.subjectGovernmenten
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subject.classificationDrugs and Drug Industryen
dc.subject.classificationQuality of Health Careen
dc.subject.classificationGenetic Screening / Genetic Testingen
dc.subject.classificationBusiness Ethicsen
dc.titleDirect-to-consumer genetic tests, government oversight, and the First Amendment: what the government can (and can't) do to protect the public's healthen
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the Bioethics Research Library, Georgetown University, for the National Information Resource on Ethics and Human Genetics, a project funded by the United States National Human Genome Research Instituteen
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText Livelink Discovery Server database named GenETHX to DSpace collection GenETHX hosted by Georgetown Universityen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2019 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885