Show simple item record

dc.creatorSheldon, Sallyen
dc.creatorWilkinson, Stephenen
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-12T18:17:44Zen
dc.date.available2011-07-12T18:17:44Zen
dc.date.created2004-06en
dc.date.issued2004-06en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationMedical Law Review 2004 Summer; 12(2): 137-163en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/504916en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageengen
dc.source273698en
dc.subject.classificationValue / Quality of Lifeen
dc.subject.classificationSocial Control of Science and Technologyen
dc.subject.classificationIn Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transferen
dc.subject.classificationGenetic Screening / Genetic Testingen
dc.subject.classificationSocial Control of Human Experimentationen
dc.subject.classificationDonation / Procurement of Organs and Tissuesen
dc.subject.classificationMinors / Parental Consenten
dc.titleHashmi and Whitaker: an unjustifiable and misguided distinction?en
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the Bioethics Research Library, Georgetown University, for the National Information Resource on Ethics and Human Genetics, a project funded by the United States National Human Genome Research Instituteen
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText Livelink Discovery Server database named GenETHX to DSpace collection GenETHX hosted by Georgetown Universityen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885