The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savelescu.
Journal of medical ethics 2010 Mar ; 36(3): 148-51
Ingmar Persson and Julian Savelescu argue that non-traditional forms of cognitive enhancement (those involving genetic engineering or pharmaceuticals) present a serious threat to humanity, since the fruits of such enhancement, accelerated scientific progress, will give the morally corrupt minority of humanity new and more effective ways to cause great harm. And yet it is scientific progress, accelerated by non-traditional cognitive enhancement, which could allow us to dramatically morally enhance human beings, thereby eliminating, or at least reducing, the threat from the morally corrupt minority. I argue that this apparently intractable dilemma is less difficult to resolve than Persson and Savelescu suppose. Their analysis of non-traditional cognitive enhancement overstates the risks and undervalues the benefits that such enhancement might provide. Once the benefits are better described, it is clear that non-traditional cognitive enhancement could be the means of our survival, not of our destruction.
Permanent LinkFind Full Text at Georgetown University Library
Full Text from Publisher
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity Persson, Ingmar; Savulescu, Julian (2008-08)As history shows, some human beings are capable of acting very immorally. Technological advance and consequent exponential growth in cognitive power means that even rare evil individuals can act with catastrophic effect. ...