Show simple item record

dc.creatorLevy, Danielen
dc.creatorSplansky, Greta Leeen
dc.creatorStrand, Nicolle K.en
dc.creatorAtwood, Larry D.en
dc.creatorBenjamin, Emelia J.en
dc.creatorBlease, Susanen
dc.creatorCupples, L Adrienneen
dc.creatorD'Agostino, Ralph B., Sr.en
dc.creatorFox, Caroline S.en
dc.creatorKelly-Hayes, Margareten
dc.creatorKoski, Gregen
dc.creatorLarson, Martin G.en
dc.creatorMutalik, Karen M.en
dc.creatorOberacker, Elizen
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-12T18:22:52Zen
dc.date.available2011-07-12T18:22:52Zen
dc.date.created2010-05en
dc.date.issued2010-05en
dc.identifier1552-4833en
dc.identifier10.1002/ajmg.a.33377en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A 2010 May ; 152A(5): 1250-6en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/515578en
dc.description.abstractExtensive efforts have been aimed at understanding the genetic underpinnings of complex diseases that affect humans. Numerous genome-wide association studies have assessed the association of genes with human disease, including the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), which genotyped 550,000 SNPs in 9,000 participants. The success of such efforts requires high rates of consent by participants, which is dependent on ethical oversight, communications, and trust between research participants and investigators. To study this we calculated percentages of participants who consented to collection of DNA and to various uses of their genetic information in two FHS cohorts between 2002 and 2009. The data included rates of consent for providing a DNA sample, creating an immortalized cell line, conducting research on various genetic conditions including those that might be considered sensitive, and for notifying participants of clinically significant genetic findings were above 95%. Only with regard to granting permission to share DNA or genetic findings with for-profit companies was the consent rate below 95%. We concluded that the FHS has maintained high rates of retention and consent for genetic research that has provided the scientific freedom to establish collaborations and address a broad range of research questions. We speculate that our high rates of consent have been achieved by establishing frequent and open communications with participants that highlight extensive oversight procedures. Our approach to maintaining high consent rates via ethical oversight of genetic research and communication with study participants is summarized in this report and should be of help to other studies engaged in similar types of research. Published 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33377en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageengen
dc.source332080en
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectDiseaseen
dc.subjectDNAen
dc.subjectFreedomen
dc.subjectGenesen
dc.subjectGenetic Informationen
dc.subjectGenetic Researchen
dc.subjectGenomeen
dc.subjectGenome-wide Association Studiesen
dc.subjectInvestigatorsen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectSnpsen
dc.subjectTrusten
dc.subject.classificationGenetics, Molecular Biology and Microbiologyen
dc.subject.classificationInformed Consenten
dc.subject.classificationHealth Care for Particular Diseases or Groupsen
dc.titleConsent for genetic research in the Framingham Heart Study.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the Bioethics Research Library, Georgetown University, for the National Information Resource on Ethics and Human Genetics, a project funded by the United States National Human Genome Research Instituteen
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText Livelink Discovery Server database named GenETHX to DSpace collection GenETHX hosted by Georgetown Universityen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885