Show simple item record

dc.creatorErwin, Cherylen
dc.creatorWilliams, Janet Ken
dc.creatorJuhl, Andrew Ren
dc.creatorMengeling, Michelleen
dc.creatorMills, James Aen
dc.creatorBombard, Yvonneen
dc.creatorHayden, Michael Ren
dc.creatorQuaid, Kimberlyen
dc.creatorShoulson, Iraen
dc.creatorTaylor, Sandraen
dc.creatorPaulsen, Jane S;en
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-12T18:22:57Zen
dc.date.available2011-07-12T18:22:57Zen
dc.date.created2010-07en
dc.date.issued2010-07en
dc.identifier1552-485Xen
dc.identifier10.1002/ajmg.b.31079en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics 2010 Jul; 153B(5): 1081-93en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/515743en
dc.description.abstractGenetic discrimination-defined as the denial of rights, privileges, or opportunities or other adverse treatment based solely on genetic information (including family history)-is an important concern to patients, healthcare professionals, lawmakers, and family members at risk for carrying a deleterious gene. Data from the United States, Canada, and Australia were collected from 433 individuals at risk for Huntington disease (HD) who have tested either positive or negative for the gene that causes HD and family members of affected individuals who have a 50% risk for developing the disorder but remain untested. Across all three countries, a total of 46.2% of respondents report genetic discrimination or stigma based on either their family history of HD or genetic testing for the HD gene mutation. We report on the overall incidence of discrimination and stigma in the domains of insurance (25.9%), employment (6.5%), relationships (32.9%), and other transactions (4.6%) in the United States, Canada, and Australia combined. The incidence of self-reported discrimination is less than the overall worry about the risk of discrimination, which is more prevalent in each domain. Despite a relatively low rate of perceived genetic discrimination in the areas of health insurance and employment, compared to the perception of discrimination and stigma in personal relationships, the cumulative burden of genetic discrimination across all domains of experience represents a challenge to those at risk for HD. The effect of this cumulative burden on daily life decisions remains unknown.en
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.31079en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageengen
dc.source333297en
dc.subjectDiseaseen
dc.subjectDiscriminationen
dc.subjectEmploymenten
dc.subjectFamily Membersen
dc.subjectGenetic Discriminationen
dc.subjectGenetic Informationen
dc.subjectGenetic Testingen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHealth Insuranceen
dc.subjectHuntington Diseaseen
dc.subjectInsuranceen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectMutationen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.subjectRisken
dc.subject.classificationGenetic Screening / Genetic Testingen
dc.subject.classificationOccupational Healthen
dc.subject.classificationNeurosciences and Mental Health Therapiesen
dc.subject.classificationEconomics of Health Careen
dc.titlePerception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington disease: the international RESPOND-HD study.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the Bioethics Research Library, Georgetown University, for the National Information Resource on Ethics and Human Genetics, a project funded by the United States National Human Genome Research Instituteen
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText Livelink Discovery Server database named GenETHX to DSpace collection GenETHX hosted by Georgetown Universityen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2023 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885