Stem cell research: A target article collection: Part II -- What's in a name: Embryos, clones, and stem cells
American Journal of Bioethics 2002 Winter; 2(1): 12-19
In 2001, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "Human Cloning Prohibition Act" and President Bush announced his decision to allow only limited research on existing stem cell lines but not on "embryos." In contrast, the U.K. has explicitly authorized "therapeutic cloning." Much more will be said about bioethical, legal, and social implications, but subtleties of the science and careful definitions of terms have received much less consideration. Legislators and reporters struggle to discuss "cloning," "pluripotency," "stem cells," and "embryos," and whether "adult" are preferable to "embryonic" stem cells as research subjects. They profess to abhor "copying humans" or "killing embryos." Do they know what they are talking about? Do we? This paper explores the historical, philosophical, and scientific contexts that inform this heated discussion.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Stem cell research: A target article collection: Part I -- Jordan's banks, a view from the first years of human embryonic stem cell research Zoloth, Laurie (2002-01)This essay will address the ethical issues that have emerged in the first considerations of the newly emerging stem cell technology. Many of us in the field of bioethics were deliberating related issues as we first learned ...
Green, Ronald M. (2002-01)In this chapter, I review some of the background thinking concerning matters of moral status that I had developed in previous years and that I would now bring to the work of the Human Embryo Research Panel. Two ideas were ...
Maienschein, Jane (2003)