R (on application of Marper and another) v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
Great Britain. Supreme Court of Judicature, Court of Appeal, Civil Division
England and Wales Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 2002 September 12; 1275-
Court Decision: The Supreme Court of Judicature, Court of Appeal, Civil Division upheld retention by the police of DNA samples and genetic profiles of two individuals based on the principle of proportionality, balancing the risks and benefits for the public against those of the individual.
Date of Decision: 2002 September 12
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
R (on application of S) v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire; R (on application of Marper) v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Great Britain. High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (2002-03-22)Court Decision: The High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, dismissed the claims of S and Marper that the Chief Constable abused his discretion by retaining fingerprints and biological samples. ...
In the European Court of Human Rights, Diane Pretty (Applicant) -v- the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Respondent Government), Application No. 2346/02. Intervention by the Voluntary Euthanasia Society of England And Wales Unknown creator (Voluntary Euthanasia Society [VES], 2002)
Durchführung einer Operation durch einen Anderen als den beim Aufklärungsgespräch vorgesehenen und vom Patienten gewünschten Arzt. Urteil des Oberlandesgerichts Köln vom 25.08.2008. Operation performed by another physician than the one the patient wished for in the pre-operation discussion. Verdict by the Provincial High Court and Court of Appeal in Köln on August 25, 2008 Rieger, H.J. (2009-02)