Bach to the future: response to: Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
Ashcroft, Richard E.
Journal of Medical Ethics 2003 August; 29(4): 217-219
Professor Robertson sketches an elegant framework for policy evaluation and regulation of the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for various medical, medical related, and non-medical purposes. In criticism of his position, I argue that the distinction between policy and ethics upon which his argument relies is highly unstable, and the approach taken to ethical evaluation of particular parental interests leaves open many issues which the policy approach would hope to exclude. In conclusion I argue that while his position ultimately fails, the onus is on his critics to come up with a viable and satisfying alternative.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Robertson, John A. (2003-08)New uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to screen embryos prior to transfer raise ethical, legal, and policy issues that deserve close attention. Extensions for medical purposes, such as to identify susceptibility ...
Sex selection by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for nonmedical reasons in contemporary Israeli regulations Grazi, Richard V.; Wolowelsky, Joel B.; Krieger, David J. (2008-06)
Robertson, John A. (2003-03)