Wrongful Life: A Birth Defective Child Born Prior to Roe v. Wade Does Not Have a Valid Cause of Action in Wrongful Life Against the Physician Who Failed To Inform Its Mother of the Option of an Abortion

dc.creator	LaCroix, Corrine A.	en
dc.date.accessioned	2011-07-12T18:40:49Z	en
dc.date.available	2011-07-12T18:40:49Z	en
dc.date.created	1993	en
dc.date.issued	1993	en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation	SETON HALL LAW REVIEW 1993; 23(4): 1876-1910	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10822/544925	en
dc.description	Hummel v. Reiss, N.J. (1992)	en
dc.format	Article	en
dc.language	eng	en
dc.source	123755	en
dc.subject	Abortion	en
dc.subject	Life	en
dc.subject	Wrongful Life	en
dc.subject.classification	Genetic Counseling / Prenatal Diagnosis	en
dc.subject.classification	Abortion Counseling	en
dc.title	Wrongful Life: A Birth Defective Child Born Prior to Roe v. Wade Does Not Have a Valid Cause of Action in Wrongful Life Against the Physician Who Failed To Inform Its Mother of the Option of an Abortion	en
dc.provenance	Digital citation created by the Bioethics Research Library, Georgetown University, for the National Information Resource on Ethics and Human Genetics, a project funded by the United States National Human Genome Research Institute	en
dc.provenance	Digital citation migrated from OpenText Livelink Discovery Server database named GenETHX to DSpace collection GenETHX hosted by Georgetown University	en

Related items