Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Government
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Department of Government
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Government
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Department of Government
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    How superpowers go to war and why other states help them : the impact of asymmetric security interdependence on war coalition formation

    Cover for How superpowers go to war and why other states help them : the impact of asymmetric
      security interdependence on war coalition formation
    View/Open
    View/Open: fritzAlarik.pdf (1.7MB) Bookview

    Creator
    Fritz, Alarik M.
    Description
    Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2008.; Includes bibliographical references. Nations usually go to war to defend against a threat (balancing) or gain some profit (bandwagoning). However, they sometimes join war coalitions without such motivations - or refuse to join them despite great pressure from the coalition leader. For example, the US-led coalition against Iraq in 2003 was largely composed of states that were not traditional US allies, were not threatened by Iraq, and had little to gain from the invasion. Furthermore, the US surprisingly failed to enlist key allies in the coalition. Are coalition formation dynamics different now than during the Cold War? This is an important question because such war coalitions may be more common in the future.; This dissertation examines the impact of asymmetric security interdependence between minor states and a superpower vis-à-vis their war coalition choices. Shifts in the global balance of power, such as from bipolarity to unipolarity, can lead to shifts in security interdependence because the security motivations for the superpower and minor states can become 'delinked' from each other. Some minor states become less concerned about their relationship with the unipole (because they are no longer threatened by the other bipole) while others become more concerned with it because of long-term regional threats (they can no longer rely upon a bipolar ally to protect them). This shift, when combined with the fact that the superpower-as-coalition leader values the contributions of some minor states more than others (due to its warplans) can lead to situations of asymmetric security interdependence.; Such interdependence is a source of power - thus it can determine which state is more likely to have greater bargaining leverage, which one pays for a coalition contribution, and how that contribution comes about. This explains many notable puzzles of coalition formation, including the failure of the US to enlist a Turkish contribution in 2003 and why states like Poland went to great lengths to contribute to US-led coalitions in 1990-91 and 2003. To test this, I examine three war coalitions (Operation Iraqi Freedom, The Korean War, and Desert Storm) and US efforts to enlist the support of four minor states (Turkey, Japan, Germany and Poland).
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/553080
    Date Published
    2008
    Subject
    War; Security, International; International relations; Coalitions--Case studies
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Collections
    • Department of Government
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for TRANSITION METAL-CATALYZED CARBON-CARBON AND CARBON-NITROGEN BOND FORMATION AND ASYMMETRIC CATALYSIS WITH BISOXAZOLIDINE LIGANDS

      TRANSITION METAL-CATALYZED CARBON-CARBON AND CARBON-NITROGEN BOND FORMATION AND ASYMMETRIC CATALYSIS WITH BISOXAZOLIDINE LIGANDS 

      Xu, Hanhui (Georgetown University, 2012)
      Palladium-phosphinous acids and chlorophosphine analogues have attracted increasing interest due to their high catalytic activity in various organic transformations, long shelf-life and facile handling. In this thesis, it ...
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility