Show simple item record

Files in this item

Cover for Nostalgia, memory and decline at the dawn of modern political thought
dc.creatoren
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-10T16:17:01Zen
dc.date.available2012-02-10T16:17:01Zen
dc.date.created2008en
dc.date.issueden
dc.identifier.otherAPT-BAG: georgetown.edu.10822_553107.tar;APT-ETAG: 7d7eeafb521ab9cfec41e7cbc0ce211fen
dc.identifier.urien
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2008.; Includes bibliographical references. This dissertation examines the relationship between our understanding of the past and the idea of decline in modern political thought. I contend that the manner in which we recall our history frames our horizon of political possibilities. Biblical and pagan thought present two different but overlapping interpretations of the cosmos and time. In their original form, each provides its adherents with definite limits to human existence and erects boundaries to our ability to alter the foundations of political and social life. In modernity each of these undergoes a profound transformation that alters man's perceptions of life and its meaning. Specifically, they foster two distinct but overlapping modes of interpretation in memory and nostalgia. Using the writings of Rousseau, Burke, Tocqueville, and Nietzsche, I seek to defend the importance of historical memory because of the way it fosters political constraint---particularly amidst political and social decline. Understanding the possibilities and dangers implicit within these ideas, we may better realize the potential for maintaining free societies.en
dc.formatapplication/pdfen
dc.languageengen
dc.publisherGeorgetown Universityen
dc.sourceDept. of Government, Ph.D. Dissertations, 2008en
dc.subjectPhilosophy; Political Science, Generalen
dc.titleNostalgia, memory and decline at the dawn of modern political thoughten
dc.typethesisen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record