Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • School of Continuing Studies
    • Liberal Studies
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • School of Continuing Studies
    • Liberal Studies
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Alice Paul : woman suffrage and gender bias in the American ideal

    Cover for Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Alice Paul : woman suffrage and gender
      bias in the American ideal
    View/Open
    View/Open: laCossJoanHarkin.pdf (585kB) Bookview

    Creator
    LaCoss, Joan Harkin.
    Description
    Thesis (M.A.L.S.)--Georgetown University, 2010.; Includes bibliographical references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. The woman suffrage movement in the United States was a reaction to gender bias in the American ideal. This protracted struggle started in Seneca Falls, New York, with the Women's Rights Convention of 1848 and ended with the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution in 1920. The suffragists encountered many obstacles both outside and inside the movement. Outside tensions grew out of the inherent masculinity of a society that subscribed to the sentiment that women should be excluded from the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the equal rights of American democracy and citizenship. Inside tensions reflected differences in ideology, philosophy, and methodology among various suffrage factions. The years of the woman suffrage movement saw many social and political events and technological advancements. However, the development that led to perhaps the greatest challenge to the cultural tradition of female inferiority was the rise of radical feminist suffragists, particularly Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Alice Paul. These women were true agents of change who rebelled against gender-based injustice to demand a political voice for women. Using the work of these three women as a basis, this thesis will consider two questions: 1. Why was the fight for suffrage so prolonged? and 2. Why was suffrage achieved in 1920 and not any other time?; This examination of the American Woman Suffrage Movement will begin with a review of the status of women in American society in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, including the establishment and evolution of the major suffrage organizations: the National Woman's Suffrage Association, the American Woman Suffrage Association, The National American Woman Suffrage Association, and the National Woman's Party. These events will be investigated in the context of the rise of radical feminist suffragists Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Alice Paul; the impact of social, political, cultural developments and seemingly inexorable gender bias; the push for inclusion in the American ideal, and the work that ultimately resulted in the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution insuring the right to vote for all citizens.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/553350
    Date Published
    2010
    Subject
    Women's Studies; American History
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Collections
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Gender Differences and Performance in Science 

      Muller, Carol B.; Ride, Sally M.; Fouke, Janie; Whitney, Telle; Denton, Denice D.; Cantor, Nancy; Nelson, Donna J.; Plummer, Jim; Busch-Vishniac, Ilene; Meyers, Carolyn; Rosser, Sue V.; Schiebinger, Londa; Roberts, Eric; Burgess, David; Beeson, Craig; Metz, Susan Staffin; Sanders, Lucinda; Watford, Bevlee A.; Ivey, Elizabeth S.; Fox, Mary Frank; Wettack, Sheldon; Klawe, Maria; Wulf, William A.; Girgus, Joan; Leboy, Phoebe, S.; Babco, Eleanor L.; Shanahan, Betty; Didion, Catherine; Chubin, Daryl E.; Frize, Monique; Ganter, Susan L.; Nalley, E. Ann; Franz, Judy; Abruna, Hector D.; Strober, Myra H.; Daniels, Jane Zimmer; Carter, Emily A.; Rhodes, Jean H.; Schrijver, Iris; Zakian, Virginia A.; Simons, Barbara; Martin, Ursula; Boaler, Jo; Jolluck, Katherine Rose; Mankekar, Purnima; Gray, Robert M.; Conkey, Margaret W.; Stansky, Peter; Xie, Aihua; Martin, Pino; Katehi, Linda P.B.; Miller, Jo Anne; Thornton, Amelia Tess; LaPaugh, Andrea; Rhode, Deborah L.; Gelpi, Barbara C.; Harrold, Mary Jean; Spencer, Cherrill M (2005-02-18)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility