Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • School of Continuing Studies
    • Liberal Studies
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • School of Continuing Studies
    • Liberal Studies
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Replacing original sin with prayerful hope as Catholic theology's response to the problem of evil

    Cover for Replacing original sin with prayerful hope as Catholic theology's response to the
      problem of evil
    View/Open
    View/Open: notiAdav.pdf (448kB) Bookview

    Creator
    Noti, Adav.
    Description
    Thesis (M.A.L.S.)--Georgetown University, 2008.; Includes bibliographical references. The theological problem of evil poses a substantial challenge to all monotheistic faith traditions. In Roman Catholic theology, the primary response to the problem of evil is the doctrine of original sin. According to this doctrine, human suffering is attributable to a putatively historical event: The first people, Adam and Eve, introduced disorder into creation by disobeying a divine command. This disorder transformed human existence from a state of "original justice," in which humanity experienced neither death nor suffering, to a state of original sin, in which each person is inclined toward sinful activity and vulnerable to harm. The state of original sin is transmitted from parent to child at conception, and, although baptism erases the metaphysical taint of Adam and Eve's deed, the concrete effects of original sin are permanent, subjecting each person to a lifetime of moral error, physical hardship, and certain death.; In the thesis that follows, I demonstrate that the doctrine of original sin is theologically deficient, that it conflicts with other Church teachings, and that it inflicts harm on both the faith community and the Church itself. As a result, I argue that the Church should cease employing original sin in response to the problem of evil. In place of original sin, I propose adopting a theological concept that I entitle "prayerful hope." This concept -- which is derived from the Church's recent reanalysis of the doctrine of limbo -- argues that those who suffer should challenge God through prayer to end their suffering, and the Church should explain to the faithful that there is good reason to believe that such prayers will be answered. I demonstrate that this teaching would correct the theological errors that pervade the doctrine of original sin, would be consistent with all major Church doctrines, and would take a significant step toward ameliorating the damage that original sin has wreaked on the Church and its followers. I conclude by demonstrating that the Church could replace original sin with prayerful hope at little cost to the Church's magisterial authority, and I recommend a specific procedure for effecting this long overdue theological change.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/553367
    Date Published
    2008
    Subject
    Theology; Religion, Philosophy of; Religion, General
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Collections
    • Liberal Studies Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Why God and Darwin won't go away [review of An Evolving Dialogue: Theological and Scientific Perspectives on Evolution, by James B. Miller; Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, by Pascal Boyer; Darwin's God: Evolution and the Problem of Evil, by Cornelius G. Hunter; Doing without Adam and Eve: Sociobiology and Original Sin, by Patricia A. Williams] 

      White, Ronald F. (2002-01)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility