dc.description | Thesis (M.A.L.S.)--Georgetown University, 2011.; Includes bibliographical
references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. Dr. Josef Mengele's pseudo-scientific
research at the Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II led to immeasurable suffering
amongst the camp's children. I have decided to focus on the Auschwitz children due to
Mengele's contradictory behavior towards these specific prisoners. Furthermore, I am to
research his experimental trails and apply accepted medical ethics to these results in an
effort to determine if they have any redeeming value, or should be completey discarded. I also
plan to document Mengele's upbringing and his personal impetus for conducting these heinous
experiments. I will then analyze Mengele's behavior through philosophical ethics in an effort
to determine his ultimate goals and motivations. Moreover, I will build an ethical framework
of Dr. Mengele's research by comparing its nature to the medical trials conducted by fellow SS
doctors employed in Auschwitz. Finally, I will ask whether or not it is ethical to utilize
research findings collected from unethical research. My hypothesis states that Josef Mengele's
research on children is both scientifically immaterial and wholly unethical.; This thesis will
begin by detailing Mengele's evolution as a Racial Hygienist, specifically from his early
roots in the Gunzberg Nazi Part to his devastating research conducted on the children of
Auschwitz. I will apply both accepted medical ethics such as 'do no harm' and several
philosophical constructs such as 'utilitarianism', to Mengele's work in an attempt to
eliminate any ethical ambiguity. The thesis will further analyze the overall historical impact
of Josef Mengele, and determine whether or not the infamous SS doctor continued his research
while evading capture in South America.; The research methods utilized were mainly available
in Georgetown University's libraries. I accessed several historical and ethical writings held
in the Bioethics Research library and Lauinger Library. Furthermore, I reviewed several works
from fellow DC institutions such as Catholic University and American University. Moreover, I
interviewed a post-doctoral research assistant at Princeton University to gain a modern
ethical perspective. Finally, I traveled to the Auschwitz concentration camp located in
Oswiecim, Poland. During my visit, I gained a deeper perspective of the camp conditions and a
broader understanding of the research conducted by Josef Mengele.; Unlike man of his fellow SS
officers, Josef Mengele was not motivated by virulent anti-Semitism. Rather, he accepted the
post to Auschwitz in an attempt to unlock the programmability of genetics. Josef Mengele
eschewed his professional and social ethics in an attempt to advance his academic career, and
relished the power he held over the prisoners of Auschwitz.; In conclusion, Josef Mengele's
experiments were so heinous and so evil that no good could ever have come from his trials. No
matter how one assesses Mengele's pseudo scientific merit or analyzes his results through an
ethical spectrum, only one conclusion can be reached. This author strongly believes that the
research conducted by Josef Mengele was professionally and philosophically unethical, and any
use of his results would likewise be impermissible. | en |