Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Program of Security Studies
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Program of Security Studies
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Cooperative capacity : US foreign policy and building stability in Northeast Asia

    Cover for Cooperative capacity : US foreign policy and building stability in Northeast
      Asia
    View/Open
    View/Open: nagleThomas.pdf (229kB) Bookview

    Creator
    Nagle, Thomas James.
    Description
    Thesis (M.A.)--Georgetown University, 2009.; Includes bibliographical references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. In the post-World War II era, the US has helped shape much of the structure of international relations. As one of the centers of global power the US is concerned about, Northeast Asia has a variety of challenges that include a potentially threatening China, a "rogue" regime in North Korea, and deep historical animosities. Despite these destabilizing factors, the region has not experienced a serious breakdown of order. The stability of the region, measured by a tendency to move toward equilibrium when experiencing significant system change, is a major goal of US foreign policy. This paper will ask two primary questions related to this regional system dynamic. First, what impact has American foreign policy had in shaping the region's ability to move towards equilibrium, and what are its foundations? Second, given how the system adjusts, what are the implications of some of the major strategic choices the US may face? The hypothesis of this paper is that under the umbrella of US security guarantees, Asian states have developed, or are developing, complementary economic and political strategies, building stability in the regional system. This interdependence is emerging as a result of states adopting policies in which they forgo "normal" state capabilities, such as defense, in order to maximize the return on the investment of their resources. The Waltzian penalties on such strategies predicted by neo-realism are not occurring because the US is providing key cooperative capabilities in five areas: providing a high concentration of power to overcome collective action problems, preventing concern over relative gains, preventing heavy discounting of the value of future returns, providing an epistemic community to assist in policy adjustments, and providing a credible regime-building capability. While the US commitment to Northeast Asia continues to be an important aspect of regional stability, this paper suggests a deliberate effort by the US can assist the region in developing internally-generated stability, provided a balance can be struck between competing priorities in short-term management and long-term development.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/553546
    Date Published
    2009
    Subject
    Political Science, International Law and Relations
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Collections
    • Program of Security Studies
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for Fighting Over War: The Bureaucratic Role in Creating War-Terminating Bargains

      Fighting Over War: The Bureaucratic Role in Creating War-Terminating Bargains 

      Nagle, Thomas James (Georgetown University, 2013)
      The bargaining model of war assigns a central role to information, which enables belligerents to reduce mutual uncertainty. Although no two wars are identical, ceteris paribus, an enhanced ability to receive and interpret ...
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility