Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Inferred Propositions and the Expression of the Evidence Relation in Natural Language: Evidentiality in Central Alaskan Yup'ik Eskimo and English

    Cover for Inferred Propositions and the Expression of the Evidence Relation in  Natural Language: Evidentiality in Central Alaskan Yup'ik Eskimo and English
    View/Open
    View/Open: Krawczyk_georgetown_0076D_11765.pdf (2.0MB) Bookview

    Creator
    Krawczyk, Elizabeth Allyn
    Advisor
    Portner, Paul
    Abstract
    <italic>Evidentiality</italic> has usually been defined as the grammaticalized expression
     
    of a speaker's evidence source for a proposition, where evidence is conceptualized as a speaker's source-type for a particular proposition (Aikhenvald 2004). How this evidence source-type and the evidential are related has yet to be formally modeled in the formal semantics literature. In fact, defining evidence has been considered a problem not relevant to linguistics (Faller 2002). In most cases, what is meant by the term evidence is never even discussed.
     
    If it were the case that evidentials exhibited regular behavior, only marking those propositions learned by whichever the particular type of evidence that it is considered to express, then the semantics of evidentials would not require further discussion. Things are not this simple, however, as there are a number of cases of evidence-evidential mismatch, where an evidential is used felicitously in spite of the fact that the speaker does not possess the correct evidence source-type (Faller 2002; Krawczyk 2009, 2010). The source-type description of evidentials does not reflect the facts, and only
     
    describes the basic, typical cases. Oversimplification of the evidential signal as source-type obscures interesting facts about evidentials and evidence.
     
    The goal of this dissertation is two-fold. The first is to provide a more thorough discussion of what it means to be evidence for evidentials; the second is to illustrate how a model of evidence can capture the semantics and pragmatics of evidentials. I formalize the notion of evidence relevant to evidentials as an evidence relation, an abductive inference to the best-fit explanation given what one observes, and propose that evidentials mark those propositions that are the best-fit explanation for the speaker's observation. I use original data from Central Alaskan Yup'ik Eskimo and English, as well as data from other publications, to illustrate how the evidence relation and best-fit explanation proposal can account for both the normal and problematic cases for the source-type approach, and provide insight into the nature of evidentiality in general.
     
    Description
    Ph.D.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/557713
    Date Published
    2012
    Subject
    Linguistics; Linguistics;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    324 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Cover for A Hybrid Approach to Inferring a Consistent Temporal Relation Set in Natural Language Text

      A Hybrid Approach to Inferring a Consistent Temporal Relation Set in Natural Language Text 

      Lee, Chong Min (Georgetown University, 2013)
      This dissertation investigates the temporal relation identification
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility