Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Arabic and Islamic Studies
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Arabic & Islamic Studies
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Arabic and Islamic Studies
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Arabic & Islamic Studies
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    SCHOOL BOUNDARIES AND SOCIAL UTILITY IN ISLAMIC LAW: THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF TALFĪQ AND TATABBUʿ AL-RUKHAṢ IN EGYPT

    Cover for SCHOOL BOUNDARIES AND SOCIAL UTILITY IN ISLAMIC LAW: THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF TALFĪQ AND TATABBUʿ AL-RUKHAṢ IN EGYPT
    View/Open
    View/Open: Ibrahim_georgetown_0076D_11073.pdf (1.5MB) Bookview

    Creator
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry
    Advisor
    Opwis, Felicitas M
    Abstract
    In this study, I focus on how the Ottoman legal establishment used the pluralistic Sunni legal system to serve the needs of Egyptian society. I examine a thousand and one cases from three Egyptian courts from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, namely the Courts of Misr al-Qadima, al-Bab al-Ali and Bulaq. I show that although the Ottomans supported Hanafism as the official school, it functioned more like a default school, in which most cases were brought to Hanafi judges unless there was a need to bring them to other judges. When there was a need to choose another school, the most lenient school was used to facilitate people's transactions. This was achieved through either tatabbu al-rukhas or talfiq. Those practices of the court, which date back to the Mamluk period, led to a change in juristic attitudes towards the pragmatic crossing of school boundaries. In the process of the legal theoretical adjustment to social practice, debates over the validity of talfiq and tatabbu al-rukhas raged after the stabilization of the schools and the ascendancy of taqlid, eventually leading to a breach of the classical consensus over their ban. Although this process started as early as the thirteenth century, the debate continued well into the Ottoman period.
     
    Those Ottoman debates laid the way for the codification of Sharia in the twentieth century, using those pragmatic approaches. Modern jurists and legislators engaged those same Ottoman debates in their own discussion of crossing school boundaries for utility. Through a marriage between theory and practice, I argue that the codification of Sharia in the twentieth century can therefore be viewed as a natural evolution of the Ottoman legal system. In the first two chapters, I trace the views towards crossing school boundaries to show that there was a gradual shift in juristic attitudes in favor of permitting crossing school boundaries, contrary to some contemporary scholars' argument that talfiq was outright forbidden in the pre-modern period. In the third and fourth chapters, I discuss the practice of seventeenth and eighteenth-century Egypt and compare it with the modern codification of Sharia.
     
    Description
    Ph.D.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/557925
    Date Published
    2011
    Subject
    Islamic court practice; codification of Islamic law; Islamic law; Islamic modernization; Islamic legal theory; Islamic legal modernity; Islamic rituals; Islamic divorce law; Mamluk legal history; religious endowments; Ottoman legal history; Islam and culture; Religion; Law; Islamic Culture; Religion; Law;
    Type
    thesis
    Embargo Lift Date
    2015-05-15
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    238 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Arabic & Islamic Studies
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      A Survey of Community Members' Perceptions of Medical Errors in Oman 

      Al-Mandhari, Ahmed S.; Al-Shafee, Mohammed A.; Al-Azri, Mohammed H.; Al-Zakwani, Ibrahim S.; Khan, Mushtaq; Al-Waily, Ahmed M.; Rizvi, Syed (2008)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility