Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Program of Security Studies
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
    • Program of Security Studies
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    COURTS, COMMISSIONS AND DETENTION AS TOOLS IN COMBATING OVERSEAS TERRORISM: CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING THE CORRECT FORUM

    Cover for COURTS, COMMISSIONS AND DETENTION AS TOOLS IN COMBATING OVERSEAS TERRORISM: CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING THE CORRECT FORUM
    View/Open
    View/Open: Mellis_georgetown_0076M_11427.pdf (494kB) Bookview

    Creator
    Mellis, Jon Andrew
    Advisor
    Byman, Daniel L
    Abstract
    As the ten-year anniversary of 9/11 approaches, the United States government remains undecided as to how it should proceed against those individuals believed to be responsible for the terrorist attacks. Both the Bush and Obama administrations, as well as Congress, have made policy announcements, promulgated Executive Orders and passed legislation that would allow for the prosecution of these individuals in either an Article III court (a criminal trial in federal district court) or before a military commission, or determine whether they should remain in military detention without trial for the duration of hostilities against al Qaeda and those entities responsible for 9/11. To this day, however, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 plot, remains in U.S. military custody, the future of legal proceedings against him no more certain than they were in 2003, the year he was first detained by U.S. forces. Similarly, should Osama bin Laden or another high level al Qaeda leader be captured in the near future, no policy currently exists that would definitively determine which, if any, judicial forum is most appropriate for the disposition of their case. The lack of a coherent analytical framework that allows for consistent forum determinations when assessing the merits of a case against an overseas terrorist suspect has led to inconsistent decision-making and has fostered a growing credibility gap in U.S. counterterrorism policy. By applying a set of proposed criteria to individual cases, it is possible for policymakers to assess whether an Article III prosecution should be pursued in a given case or whether application of the criteria mitigates toward an alternative disposition, such as military commission or preventive detention.
    Description
    M.A.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/558173
    Date Published
    2011
    Subject
    Article III Courts; Detention Policy; Military Commissions; National Security; Overseas Terrorism; U.S. Counterterrorism Policy; Law; Public policy; International law; Law; Public Policy and Social Welfare; International Law;
    Type
    thesis
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    81 leaves
    Collections
    • Program of Security Studies
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Combating Terrorism: Observations on the Threat of Chemical and Biological Terrorism. Statement of Henry L. Hinton, Jr., Assistant Comptroller General, National Security and International Affairs Division, Before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives 

      Unknown author (United States. General Accounting Office [GAO], 1999-10-20)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility