Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Georgetown College
    • Department of Linguistics
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Role of Individual Differences in L1 and L2 Processing of Bridging and Predictive Inferences

    Cover for The Role of Individual Differences in L1 and L2 Processing of Bridging and Predictive Inferences
    View/Open
    View/Open: Lake_georgetown_0076D_12773.pdf (3.8MB) Bookview

    Creator
    Lake, Julie Beth
    Advisor
    Mackey, Alison
    Kotz, Sonja
    Abstract
    Second language acquisition (SLA) and psycholinguistic researchers are interested in how inferences are processed in first language (L1) and second language (L2) reading to better understand how learners negotiate for meaning within a text. Preliminary evidence from brain-based studies suggests that bridging inferences (i.e., connecting pronouns and referents) may rely more heavily on short-term memory (STM) (Burkhardt, 2006) while predictive inferences (i.e., forecasting upcoming events from textual information) may rely more heavily on cognitive control (CC) (Jin et al., 2009). However, despite these advances, it is still not clear whether or not L2 readers have access to the necessary linguistic structures (Horiba, 1996) or, instead, if proficiency level is a confounding variable (Cohen, 1998; Guerrero, 2005; Leontiev, 1981).
     
    To address these gaps, an L1 English reading study and an L2 English reading study were carried out to explore whether or not inferences are processed differently than non-inferences, whether or not bridging and predictive inferences are processed differently from one another, and which cognitive resources are recruited during the processing of bridging and predictive inferences. The L1 and L2 data were compared to see if inference processing differs based on language background. L1 English speakers (n = 50) and L2 English-L1 Spanish speakers (n = 23) completed a cumulative self-paced reading task in a distraction paradigm; participants read scenarios that required them to make a bridging inference, a predictive inference or no inference with interference (while completing a secondary task that taxed STM or CC) or without interference. Independent measures of STM and CC were also collected to see whether these scores were associated with reading performance.
     
    The results indicated that L1 and proficient L2 readers process inferences similarly. Participants relied on CC for bridging and predictive inferences, supporting a multi-component framework of attentional control capacity (Barnes & Jones, 2000). These results are consistent with research on individual difference in SLA (e.g., Dornyei & Skehan, 2003), in that they suggest that CC may influence L2 classroom learning and account for the variation in L2 reading acquisition. Additionally, the findings have implications for L2 testing, as they pose a threat to the internal validity of standardized reading tests and ultimately the grade-level placement of L2 readers.
     
    Description
    Ph.D.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/712461
    Date Published
    2014
    Subject
    Attentional Models; Bridging Inferences; Individual Differences; L1 versus L2 reading; Predictive Inferences; Sentence Processing; Linguistics; Linguistics;
    Type
    thesis
    Embargo Lift Date
    2017-01-08
    Publisher
    Georgetown University
    Extent
    291 leaves
    Collections
    • Graduate Theses and Dissertations - Linguistics
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Moral Awareness and Ethical Predispositions: Investigating the Role of Individual Differences in the Recognition of Moral Issues 

      Reynolds, Scott J. (2006-01)
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2022 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility