Georgetown University LogoGeorgetown University Library LogoDigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Georgetown University in Qatar
    • Qatar Faculty Scholarship
    • View Item
    •   DigitalGeorgetown Home
    • Georgetown University Institutional Repository
    • Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service
    • Georgetown University in Qatar
    • Qatar Faculty Scholarship
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Iranian Shi’ism under Debate

    Creator
    Kamrava, Mehran
    Abstract
    More than two decades after its victory, Iran’s Islamic revolution has resulted in profound theoretical and theological consequences for Shiite political thought. This unfolding discourse especially as represented by the writings of highly celebrated figures such as Abdolkarim Soroush, Hojjatoleslam Hasan Yosufi Eshkevari, Hojjatoleslam Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Hojjatoleslam Mohsen Kadivar revolves around two principal themes: the question of religion and reform, and religion and social and political freedom. These questions, which go the heart of Shiism’s role in the larger polity, are, significantly, being asked by notable members of the clerical establishment and by other renowned thinkers. Equally important is the fluid political context within which these Shiite thinkers are gaining increasing intellectual popularity among the urban middle classes, therefore magnifying the relevance of their writings to evolving political circumstances. Already the consequences of the debate have proven to be more than merely philosophical. The discourse has had a significant impact on the formulation of public policy in Iran, on the larger Iranian polity, and even on Iran’s relations with the outside world. Not surprisingly, the evolving nature of the discourse, and the direction in which the debate ultimately heads, will determine much in the future of Iranian politics.
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/10822/713160
    External Link
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4967.00109
    Date Published
    2003
    Rights
    This item is currently unavailable in DigitalGeorgetown due to copyright restrictions by the publisher.
    Subject
    Iran; Islam; Political Change; Religion Politics Relationship; International Relations; Politics and Religion;
    Type
    Article
    Is Part Of
    Middle East Policy, 10(2).
    Publisher
    Wiley
    Collections
    • Qatar Faculty Scholarship
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • Thumbnail

      Iranian National-Security Debates: Factionalism and Lost Opportunities 

      Kamrava, Mehran (Wiley, 2007)
      Iran’s national-security policy is a victim of the factional debates and disagreements that characterize the Islamic Republic’s political system. ¬¬There are currently three main factions in Iran — the radicals, the ...
    Related Items in Google Scholar

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DigitalGeorgetownCommunities & CollectionsCreatorsTitlesBy Creation DateThis CollectionCreatorsTitlesBy Creation Date

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Georgetown University Seal
    ©2009 - 2023 Georgetown University Library
    37th & O Streets NW
    Washington DC 20057-1174
    202.687.7385
    digitalscholarship@georgetown.edu
    Accessibility