Obstructed Death Revisited
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1982 Sep; 8(3): 154-156.
Three commentaries are presented on a case conference, "Truth at the last--a case of obstructed death," which appeared in the March 1982 issue. The case involved collusion between a physician and a family member to withhold the truth from a terminally ill patient. The commentaries discuss the possible psychological need of dying patients to resolve "unfinished business," and the physician's general commitment to honesty. (KIE abstract)
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Higgs, Roger (1990-06)The dilemma of whether or not a doctor should tell a patient dying of cancer the truth remains a difficult one, as the disagreement between the two previous writers shows. One favours giving priority to patient autonomy, ...
Higgs, Roger (1982-03)A physician describes and comments on the case of a middle-aged couple in which the husband requests that his wife not be told she has an incurable malignancy. When the wife finally confronts the doctor and demands the ...