Psychosurgery and the Abuse of Psychiatric Authority in Ontario
Simmons, Harvey G.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 1987 Fall; 12(3): 537-550.
Over the past two decades, political and legal decisions have sharply curtailed psychiatric authority. One area in which psychiatric authority has been most limited is psychosurgery. This paper uses archival evidence from Ontario to show how psychiatrists ordered and administered psychosurgery for a wide variety of reasons. In some cases psychosurgery was administered to ease staffing problems, for experimental purposes, or simply out of sheer curiosity. Often the consent of patients or relatives was not obtained. This egregious abuse of psychiatric authority contributed to the critical movement against psychiatry and to strict laws limiting and sometimes banning resort to psychosurgery.
Administrators; Behavior Control; Clinical Ethics; Clinical Ethics Committees; Coercion; Consent; Decision Making; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Family Members; Government; Government Regulation; Human Experimentation; Informed Consent; Institutional Policies; International Aspects; Involuntary Commitment; Laws; Mass Media; Misconduct; Motivation; Paternalism; Patients; Physicians; Prevalence; Psychiatry; Psychosurgery; Public Policy; Regulation; Research; Research Ethics; Research Ethics Committees; Review; Rights; Relatives; Scientific Misconduct; Self Regulation; Third Party Consent; Voluntary Admission;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Simmons, Paul D. (1996)Biblical authority is definitive for many Protestants in matters of faith and practice. The question this essay addresses is the deafening silence of this Scriptural authority on the controversial issue of abortion, especially ...