Handicapped Infants: Medical Ethics and the Law
Creator
Raphael, D.D.
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1988 Mar; 14(1): 5-10.
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper (1) is to draw attention to a gap between the principles of Common Law and the principles accepted by many leading medical practitioners on the ethics of allowing severely handicapped infants to die. The Common Law principles are shown in Court of Appeal judgements on two cases. The contrasting principles of many paediatricians were illustrated at the trial of Dr. Leonard Arthur. The paper suggests that the gap could be closed by statutory guidance on general principles. It also argues that utilitarian concepts misrepresent the ethical issues of medical dilemmas like this one.
Date
1988-03Subject
Allowing to Die; Anencephaly; Congenital Disorders; Death; Down Syndrome; Ethics; Infants; Law; Legal Aspects; Legal Liability; Life; Liability; Medical Ethics; Moral Policy; Newborns; Parents; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Selection for Treatment; Suffering; Treatment Refusal; Utilitarianism; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment; Wrongful Death;
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Handicapped Infants: Medical Ethics and the Law
Raphael, D.D. (1988-03)