Killing, Letting Die, and Simple Conflicts
Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1989 Summer; 18(3): 238-258.
Proponents of the moral equivalence of killing and letting die argue that in cases of simple conflict, where one agent must either perform a positive act and kill one person, or not perform that act and allow another person to die, the agent's alternatives are clearly morally equivalent. Malm rejects this view in a three part essay. He argues that in cases of simple conflict, the acts of killing and letting die are morally different, and that killing is not in itself worse than letting die. Malm considers and rejects the suggestion that the agent should decide randomly between the two alternatives. He concludes that while simple conflict cases require us to recognize a morally significant difference between killing and letting die, they do not require us to recognize a morally significant difference between acting and refraining. (KIE abstract)
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Malm, H.M. (1989-06)
Killing and Letting Die: "Intentional Killing Is Prohibited. So Is the Presumption of Evil Intent." Kavanaugh, John F. (2000-09-23)
Drawing a Line Between Killing and Letting Die: The Law, and Law Reform, on Medically Assisted Dying Gostin, Lawrence O. (1993)While much has been written about the professional ethics of physician assisted dying, little is known about where the law draws the line, whether the law is enforced in practice, and how the law should be reformed to reflect ...