To Tell or Not to Tell: The Ethical Dilemmas of HIV Test Notification in Epidemiologic Research
Creator
Avins, Andrew L.
Lo, Bernard
Bibliographic Citation
American Journal of Public Health. 1989 Nov; 79(11): 1544-1548.
Abstract
Epidemiologic studies involving HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) antibody testing create ethical dilemmas, particularly about notifying asymptomatic seropositive subjects. Four study designs address this problem: mandatory notification, optional notification, anonymous testing, and blind testing. No single design consistently optimizes the trade-off between valid and ethical research. Each strategy differs substantially from the others in its effect on response rates, bias, ability to perform longitudinal studies, numbers of subjects who learn their test results, and the number of subjects counseled about HIV risk reduction. Both local institutional review boards and potential subjects of study (and their sexual partners) should participate in decisions regarding the conduct of sensitive AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) research.
Date
1989-11Subject
Aids; Aids Serodiagnosis; Anonymous Testing; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Clinical Ethics; Clinical Ethics Committees; Confidentiality; Contact Tracing; Decision Making; Disclosure; Duty to Warn; Epidemiology; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Health; HIV Seropositivity; Human Experimentation; Institutional Review Boards; Mass Screening; Moral Policy; Notification; Public Health; Public Policy; Research; Research Design; Research Ethics; Research Ethics Committees; Research Subjects; Review; Risk; Risks and Benefits; Standards; Truth Disclosure; Voluntary Programs;
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
To Tell or Not to Tell: The Ethical Dilemmas of HIV Test Notification in Epidemiologic Research
Avins, Andrew L. and Lo, Bernard (1989-11)