dc.creator | Avins, Andrew L. | en |
dc.creator | Lo, Bernard | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-05T18:27:35Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-05T18:27:35Z | en |
dc.date.created | 1989-11 | en |
dc.date.issued | 1989-11 | en |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90306-X | en |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | American Journal of Public Health. 1989 Nov; 79(11): 1544-1548. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0090-0036 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=To+Tell+or+Not+to+Tell:+the+Ethical+Dilemmas+of+HIV+Test+Notification+in+Epidemiologic+Research&title=American+Journal+of+Public+Health.+&volume=79&issue=11&pages=1544-1548&date=1989&au=Avins,+Andrew+L. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90306-X | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/734093 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Epidemiologic studies involving HIV (human immunodeficiency virus)
antibody testing create ethical dilemmas, particularly about notifying
asymptomatic seropositive subjects. Four study designs address this problem:
mandatory notification, optional notification, anonymous testing, and blind
testing. No single design consistently optimizes the trade-off between valid
and ethical research. Each strategy differs substantially from the others in
its effect on response rates, bias, ability to perform longitudinal studies,
numbers of subjects who learn their test results, and the number of subjects
counseled about HIV risk reduction. Both local institutional review boards
and potential subjects of study (and their sexual partners) should participate
in decisions regarding the conduct of sensitive AIDS (acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome) research. | en |
dc.format | Article | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.source | BRL:KIE/29502 | en |
dc.subject | Aids | en |
dc.subject | Aids Serodiagnosis | en |
dc.subject | Anonymous Testing | en |
dc.subject | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome | en |
dc.subject | Clinical Ethics | en |
dc.subject | Clinical Ethics Committees | en |
dc.subject | Confidentiality | en |
dc.subject | Contact Tracing | en |
dc.subject | Decision Making | en |
dc.subject | Disclosure | en |
dc.subject | Duty to Warn | en |
dc.subject | Epidemiology | en |
dc.subject | Ethics | en |
dc.subject | Ethics Committees | en |
dc.subject | Health | en |
dc.subject | HIV Seropositivity | en |
dc.subject | Human Experimentation | en |
dc.subject | Institutional Review Boards | en |
dc.subject | Mass Screening | en |
dc.subject | Moral Policy | en |
dc.subject | Notification | en |
dc.subject | Public Health | en |
dc.subject | Public Policy | en |
dc.subject | Research | en |
dc.subject | Research Design | en |
dc.subject | Research Ethics | en |
dc.subject | Research Ethics Committees | en |
dc.subject | Research Subjects | en |
dc.subject | Review | en |
dc.subject | Risk | en |
dc.subject | Risks and Benefits | en |
dc.subject | Standards | en |
dc.subject | Truth Disclosure | en |
dc.subject | Voluntary Programs | en |
dc.title | To Tell or Not to Tell: The Ethical Dilemmas of HIV Test Notification in Epidemiologic Research | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine. | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University. | en |