Bioethics. 1990 Oct; 4(4): 340-350.
Bayer's approach is most effective when he uses it to describe the politicized nature of AIDS policy in the United States. He succeeds in showing the reader that public health authorities dealing with the spread of HIV/AIDS had a wide variety of competing interests to take into account in formulating AIDS social policy and that political interest groups, most notably gay community organizations, played a large role in fashioning AIDS policy. Those who might have doubted the significance of contextual factors such as these for health policy, and especially for AIDS policy, will be convinced of it after reading Bayer's book. But Bayer is not content to make only descriptive claims about AIDS health policy. He is also interested in advancing normative and prescriptive claims, the nature of which, I have argued, requires an approach other than the one that he has adopted.
Aids; Aids Serodiagnosis; Blood; Blood Donation; Confidentiality; Drug Abuse; Duty to Warn; Freedom; Government; Government Regulation; Health; Homosexuals; Legal Rights; Mandatory Programs; Mass Screening; Moral Obligations; Nature; Obligations to Society; Organizations; Political Activity; Politics; Privacy; Public Health; Public Policy; Regulation; Rights; Sexuality; Voluntary Programs;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Illingworth, Patricia (1992-01)Bayer accuses me of wrongly claiming that he holds a negative thesis about the role that the liberal emphasis on privacy rights has had on AIDS public health policy. In his reply to my review essay, he denies holding such a ...