The Illusion of Patient Choice in End-of-Life Decisions
Creator
Orentlicher, David
Bibliographic Citation
JAMA. 1992 Apr 15; 267(15): 2101-2104.
Abstract
Over the past two decades a societal consensus has developed around the principle that decisions about life-sustaining treatment should be guided by patient self-determination. According to the President's Commission, the Hastings Center, the American Medical Association, and the US Supreme Court, treatment decisions should be based on the values, goals, and preferences of the patient. While theory may emphasize the patient's values, empirical data suggest that other considerations may have a greater impact on decisions about life-sustaining treatment. In particular, there is increasing evidence that physician values may be a more decisive factor than patient values in these decisions.
Date
1992-04-15Subject
Active Euthanasia; Advance Directives; Allowing to Die; Autonomy; Consensus; Consent; Decision Making; Diagnosis; Disclosure; Euthanasia; Evaluation; Family Members; Futility; Goals; Informed Consent; Legal Aspects; Life; Patients; Physician Patient Relationship; Physicians; Resuscitation; Resuscitation Orders; Risks and Benefits; Selection for Treatment; Suicide; Terminal Care; Values; Withholding Treatment;
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Illusion of Patient Choice in End-of-Life Decisions
Orentlicher, David (1992-04-15)Over the past two decades a societal consensus has developed around the principle that decisions about life-sustaining treatment should be guided by patient self-determination. According to the President's Commission, ...