dc.creator | Orentlicher, David | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-05T18:30:40Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-05T18:30:40Z | en |
dc.date.created | 1992-04-15 | en |
dc.date.issued | 1992-04-15 | en |
dc.identifier | 10.1001/jama.267.15.2101 | en |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JAMA. 1992 Apr 15; 267(15): 2101-2104. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0098-7484 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+Illusion+of+Patient+Choice+in+End-of-Life+Decisions&title=JAMA.++&volume=267&issue=15&pages=2101-2104&date=1992&au=Orentlicher,+David | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.15.2101 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/736522 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Over the past two decades a societal consensus has developed around
the principle that decisions about life-sustaining treatment should be guided
by patient self-determination. According to the President's Commission, the
Hastings Center, the American Medical Association, and the US Supreme Court,
treatment decisions should be based on the values, goals, and preferences of
the patient. While theory may emphasize the patient's values, empirical data
suggest that other considerations may have a greater impact on decisions about
life-sustaining treatment. In particular, there is increasing evidence that
physician values may be a more decisive factor than patient values in these
decisions. | en |
dc.format | Article | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.source | BRL:KIE/35892 | en |
dc.subject | Active Euthanasia | en |
dc.subject | Advance Directives | en |
dc.subject | Allowing to Die | en |
dc.subject | Autonomy | en |
dc.subject | Consensus | en |
dc.subject | Consent | en |
dc.subject | Decision Making | en |
dc.subject | Diagnosis | en |
dc.subject | Disclosure | en |
dc.subject | Euthanasia | en |
dc.subject | Evaluation | en |
dc.subject | Family Members | en |
dc.subject | Futility | en |
dc.subject | Goals | en |
dc.subject | Informed Consent | en |
dc.subject | Legal Aspects | en |
dc.subject | Life | en |
dc.subject | Patients | en |
dc.subject | Physician Patient Relationship | en |
dc.subject | Physicians | en |
dc.subject | Resuscitation | en |
dc.subject | Resuscitation Orders | en |
dc.subject | Risks and Benefits | en |
dc.subject | Selection for Treatment | en |
dc.subject | Suicide | en |
dc.subject | Terminal Care | en |
dc.subject | Values | en |
dc.subject | Withholding Treatment | en |
dc.title | The Illusion of Patient Choice in End-of-Life Decisions | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine. | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University. | en |