Point and Counterpoint: Should HECs Assess Whether 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standards Have Been Met Before Recommending the Discontinuation of Life Support, Including Nutrition and Fluids?
Creator
Weber, Leonard J.
Mahowald, Mary B.
Bibliographic Citation
HEC (Hospital Ethics Committee) Forum. 1991; 3(5): 299-304.
Permanent Link
Find in a Library.http://hdl.handle.net/10822/736986
Date
1991Subject
Advance Directives; Allowing to Die; Artificial Feeding; Autonomy; Clinical Ethics; Clinical Ethics Committees; Competence; Consent; Decision Making; Ethicists; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Family Members; Legal Aspects; Life; Nutrition; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Physicians; Standards; Third Party Consent; Values; Withholding Treatment;
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Point and Counterpoint: Do HECs Have a Responsibility to the Non-Medical Community Rather Than Only to the Institution, Physician, and Patient?
Weber, Leonard J.; Mueller, Maurice J. (1994-03) -
Point and Counterpoint: Do HECs Have a Responsibility to the Non-Medical Community Rather Than Only to the Institution, Physician, and Patient?
Weber, Leonard J.; Mueller, Maurice J. (1994-03) -
Need for Clear and Convincing Evidence of a Patient's Wishes Before Artificial Nutrition and Hydration May Be Withdrawn
Brushwood, David B. (1990-12)