Show simple item record

dc.creatorPellegrino, Edmund D.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T18:34:09Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-05T18:34:09Zen
dc.date.created1992en
dc.date.issued1992en
dc.identifier10.1017/S0963180100006551en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1992 Fall; 1(4): 361-369.en
dc.identifier.issn0963-1801en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Beneficence,+Scientific+Autonomy,+and+Self-Interest:+Ethical+Dilemmas+in+Clinical+Research&title=Cambridge+Quarterly+of+Healthcare+Ethics.++&volume=1&issue=4&pages=361-369&date=1992&au=Pellegrino,+Edmund+D.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100006551en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/737086en
dc.description.abstractThe ethics of clinical research may be viewed from three different perspectives: the process of acquiring new knowledge, the moral use of the knowledge acquired, and the ethics of the investigator seeking this knowledge....This third perspective on the ethics of clinical research is the focus of this essay. This perspective is often neglected, it is central to the moral quality of human investigations, and it is of special significance in, for example, pediatric research, where the vulnerability of the infant or child imposes graver responsibilities on the investigator than in the case with adults, who can give informed consent or refusal.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceBRL:KIE/36395en
dc.subjectAdultsen
dc.subjectAutonomyen
dc.subjectBeneficenceen
dc.subjectCommon Gooden
dc.subjectConflict of Interesten
dc.subjectCovenanten
dc.subjectClinical Researchen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectFinancial Supporten
dc.subjectHuman Experimentationen
dc.subjectIndustryen
dc.subjectInformed Consenten
dc.subjectInvestigator Subject Relationshipen
dc.subjectInvestigatorsen
dc.subjectKnowledgeen
dc.subjectMedicineen
dc.subjectMoral Obligationsen
dc.subjectMoral Policyen
dc.subjectMotivationen
dc.subjectPatient Advocacyen
dc.subjectPhysician Patient Relationshipen
dc.subjectPhysician's Roleen
dc.subjectPhysiciansen
dc.subjectProfessional Ethicsen
dc.subjectResearchen
dc.subjectResearch Designen
dc.subjectResearch Subjectsen
dc.subjectResponsibilitiesen
dc.subjectScienceen
dc.subjectSocial Controlen
dc.subjectTherapeutic Researchen
dc.subjectTrusten
dc.subjectUniversitiesen
dc.subjectValuesen
dc.subjectVirtuesen
dc.titleBeneficence, Scientific Autonomy, and Self-Interest: Ethical Dilemmas in Clinical Researchen
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885