Academic-Industry Relationships in the Life Sciences: Extent, Consequences, and Management
JAMA. 1992 Dec 16; 268(23): 3344-3349.
Academic-industry relationships in the life sciences remain controversial. The available evidence suggests that such relationships have both benefits and risks for involved parties. Benefits include additional support of academic research, income for academic health centers, the potential for increased scientific and commercial productivity in both industries and universities, and enhancement of the educational experiences of students and fellows. Risks include an increase in secrecy in academic environments and damage to public support for the life science enterprise. The balance of known benefits and risks suggests that academic-industry relationships should be permitted and even selectively promoted. However, there is also a need for enhanced vigilance on the part of academic institutions and government to reduce risks posed by certain types of arrangements, especially those involving human subjects. Enhanced vigilance should include disclosure of all academic-industry relationships by life science faculty.
Administrators; Biomedical Research; Conflict of Interest; Disclosure; Entrepreneurship; Faculty; Federal Government; Financial Support; Government; Government Regulation; Health; Industry; Information Dissemination; Investigators; Life; Life Sciences; Misconduct; Motivation; Obligations to Society; Patents; Property Rights; Public Policy; Property; Regulation; Remuneration; Research; Rights; Risks and Benefits; Science; Self Regulation; Students; Universities;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Blumenthal, David (1996-12)The author reviews in detail the status of academic-industry relationships (AIRs) in the life sciences from both ethical and empirical perspectives, and identifies ethical issues that have been resolved and those that must ...