The Wanglie Case From an Uruguayan Perspective
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1993 Spring; 2(2): 171-173.
The ethical idiosyncrasy of the Uruguayan people would divide public opinion into two groups concerning the Wanglie case. One group would agree with the physicians to terminate treatment and consider the family's demand for continued life-support treatment irrational and without sense. The second Uruguayan perspective held by a significant number of physicians and lay people would never have allowed this case to be elevated to such a problematic level. This latter group would have considered it normal procedure to continue life-support treatment until a cardiac arrest or other organic unbalance caused Mrs. Wanglie's death. They would support the Wanglie family, believing the physicians' medical duty required them to do everything possible to preserve life.
Active Euthanasia; Allowing to Die; Attitudes; Autonomy; Death; Decision Making; Economics; Euthanasia; Family Members; Futility; International Aspects; Legal Aspects; Life; Moral Policy; Paternalism; Physician Patient Relationship; Physicians; Public Opinion; Resource Allocation; Rights; Withholding Treatment;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dificultades y posibilidades de los comités de ética desde una perspectiva Latinoamericana. = Difficulties and possibilities of ethics committees in a Latin-American perspective Franca-Tarragó, Omar (2007-03)Although ethics committees in Latin America have become an essential element in the development and appropriation of bioethics on the continent, the experience of the reality of the working of the diverse existing committees ...
Franca, Omar (1988)The ethics of care for the terminally ill in Uruguay spring from deeply rooted attitudes which invest the physician with sole power to determine the course of treatment, even to prescribe painkilling drugs and to hasten ...