Emerging Parallels in the American Health Care and Legal-Judicial Systems
Hadorn, David C.
American Journal of Law and Medicine. 1992; 18(1 & 2): 73-96.
The structure and principal decision-making processes of the American health care system have, in recent years, evolved to closely resemble those of the legal-judicial system. This transformation reflects important common values that underlie both systems, including the values of life and liberty. This article analyzes quasi-legal features of the health care system and draws conclusions about how those features might be used to address the problem of health care rationing. It concludes that coverage rules, if properly developed, can provide the sort of objective framework necessary to evaluate claims of health care needs. This article also demonstrates that by defining legitimate health care needs, society can thereby potentially eliminate or forestall the need to ration necessary care. This can be achieved by using carefully developed coverage rules, rather than the informal rules currently in place, in conjunction with already existing due process methods for interpreting and implementing those rules.
Advisory Committees; Common Good; Costs and Benefits; Due Process; Economics; Freedom; Government; Government Regulation; Guidelines; Health; Health Care; Health Care Delivery; Health Insurance; Health Care Rationing; Indigents; Insurance; Justice; Law; Legal Aspects; Legislation; Life; Medicine; Methods; Obligations of Society; Patients; Physicians; Policy Analysis; Public Participation; Regulation; Resource Allocation; Selection for Treatment; Standards; Values;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hadorn, David C. (1991)Public values must play a substantial role in any attempt to deal with the health care resource allocation problem. This article examines how preferences for the health outcomes of care (e.g. improved or worsened physical ...