Abstract
In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 112 S. Ct. 2791 (1992), the U.S. Supreme Court once again reviewed the constitutionality of abortion-restrictive legislation, reworking the principles that had been originally set out in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). In doing so, the Court also provided some insight into the varying constitutional philosophies of the individual members of the Court -- and the internal politics among them. Understanding both
