Informed Consent, Cancer, and Truth in Prognosis
Creator
Annas, George J.
Bibliographic Citation
New England Journal of Medicine. 1994 Jan 20; 330(3): 223-225.
Abstract
...The national survey conducted by Louis Harris for a presidential commission on bioethics in 1982...found that 96 percent of Americans wanted to be told if they had cancer, and 85 percent wanted a "realistic estimate" of how long they had to live if their type of cancer "usually leads to death in less than a year." On the other hand, fewer than half the physicians surveyed said they would either give a "straight statistical prognosis" (13 percent) or "say that you can't tell how long [the patient] might live, but stress that in most cases people live no longer than a year" (28 percent) if the patient had a "fully confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer in an advanced stage." The country's most recent important case involving informed consent,
Date
1994-01-20Subject
Attitudes; Bioethics; Cancer; Consent; Death; Decision Making; Diagnosis; Disclosure; Drugs; Informed Consent; Legal Aspects; Legal Liability; Legal Obligations; Life; Liability; Mortality; Paternalism; Patient Participation; Physician Patient Relationship; Physicians; Prognosis; Public Opinion; Quality of Life; Radiology; Risk; Risks and Benefits; Statistics; Survey; Terminally Ill; Trust; Truth Disclosure;
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Informed Consent, Cancer, and Truth in Prognosis
Miyaji, Naoko T.; Espinosa, E.; Zamora, P.; Gonzalez Baron, M.; Ferris, Timothy; Holcombe, Randall F.; Price, Frederic V.; Kelley, Joseph L.; Edwards, Robert P.; Annas, George J. (1994-09-22)