Ethics Consultation: The Most Dangerous Profession: A Reply to Critics
Scofield, Giles R.
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1995 Spring; 4(2): 225-228.
If the responses to my article on the professionalization of ethics consultation prove anything, it is not that I missed the mark, but that I struck close to home; too close for the comfort of some. Here I respond, in kind, to the objections Professors Fletcher, Jonsen, and Self, and Dr. Lilje raised against my essay. [Article and four responses appeared in
Bioethics; Clinical Ethics; Clinical Ethics Committees; Competence; Consultation; Decision Making; Democracy; Education; Ethicist's Role; Ethicists; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Ethics Consultation; Health; Morality; Organizations; Professional Ethics; Professional Organizations; Regulation; Self Regulation; Social Control; Social Dominance; Standards; Technical Expertise; Values;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Scofield, Giles R. (1995-06)
Scofield, Giles R. (1993)[I]nstead of accepting their claims, society must consider how it might otherwise benefit from the knowledge clinical ethicists possess in a way that is consistent with its fundamental values. As it turns out, the one ...
Scofield, Giles R. (1993-09)