dc.creator | Crisp, Roger | en |
dc.creator | Hope, Tony | en |
dc.creator | Ebbs, David | en |
dc.creator | Thomasma, David C. | en |
dc.creator | Dormer, Peter | en |
dc.creator | Toon, Peter | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-05T18:53:57Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-05T18:53:57Z | en |
dc.date.created | 1996-06-15 | en |
dc.date.issued | 1996-06-15 | en |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | BMJ (British Medical Journal). 1996 Jun 15; 312(7045):
1528-1533. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0959-8138 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+Asbury+Draft+Policy+on+Ethical+Use+of+Resources.&title=BMJ+&volume=312&issue=7045&pages=1528-1533&date=1996&au=Crisp,+Roger | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10822/746774 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Many doctors find themselves torn between two contradictory
principles: to do the best for the individual patient and to be responsible
for an overall budget that is insufficient for the best care for each
individual patient. Little guidance is available for doctors on how to
resolve this conflict. Crisp et al present a draft document that one
fundholding general practice has developed to clarify the ethical basis for
rationing decisions. We invited three interested professionals to comment on
the draft. The general practice partners invited two medical ethicists [Roger
Crisp and Tony Hope] (RC and TH) to meet them to develop the document. The
partners met RC and TH for one and a half hours on eight occasions over one
year and met without them on eight further occasions. The entire general
practice also had an all day session to discuss in detail an advanced version
of the draft. The developmental process was of great value to the partnership
and has led to appreciable change in individuals' views. The draft policy
presented here is intended to start the ball rolling, so that proper
guidelines will be developed at whatever level in the NHS is most appropriate.
Comments and feedback are welcomed. | en |
dc.format | Article | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.source | BRL:KIE/51214 | en |
dc.subject | Age Factors | en |
dc.subject | Alternatives | en |
dc.subject | Autonomy | en |
dc.subject | Chronically Ill | en |
dc.subject | Decision Making | en |
dc.subject | Disclosure | en |
dc.subject | Doctors | en |
dc.subject | Economics | en |
dc.subject | Ethicists | en |
dc.subject | Family Practice | en |
dc.subject | Guidelines | en |
dc.subject | General Practice | en |
dc.subject | Health | en |
dc.subject | Health Care | en |
dc.subject | Illness | en |
dc.subject | Justice | en |
dc.subject | Life | en |
dc.subject | Patient Advocacy | en |
dc.subject | Patients | en |
dc.subject | Physicians | en |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines | en |
dc.subject | Quality Adjusted Life Years | en |
dc.subject | Resource Allocation | en |
dc.subject | Selection for Treatment | en |
dc.subject | Terminal Care | en |
dc.subject | Values | en |
dc.title | The Asbury Draft Policy on Ethical Use of Resources | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine. | en |
dc.provenance | Digital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University. | en |