Show simple item record

dc.creatorCrisp, Rogeren
dc.creatorHope, Tonyen
dc.creatorEbbs, Daviden
dc.creatorThomasma, David C.en
dc.creatorDormer, Peteren
dc.creatorToon, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-05T18:53:57Zen
dc.date.available2015-05-05T18:53:57Zen
dc.date.created1996-06-15en
dc.date.issued1996-06-15en
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMJ (British Medical Journal). 1996 Jun 15; 312(7045): 1528-1533.en
dc.identifier.issn0959-8138en
dc.identifier.urihttp://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=The+Asbury+Draft+Policy+on+Ethical+Use+of+Resources.&title=BMJ+&volume=312&issue=7045&pages=1528-1533&date=1996&au=Crisp,+Rogeren
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10822/746774en
dc.description.abstractMany doctors find themselves torn between two contradictory principles: to do the best for the individual patient and to be responsible for an overall budget that is insufficient for the best care for each individual patient. Little guidance is available for doctors on how to resolve this conflict. Crisp et al present a draft document that one fundholding general practice has developed to clarify the ethical basis for rationing decisions. We invited three interested professionals to comment on the draft. The general practice partners invited two medical ethicists [Roger Crisp and Tony Hope] (RC and TH) to meet them to develop the document. The partners met RC and TH for one and a half hours on eight occasions over one year and met without them on eight further occasions. The entire general practice also had an all day session to discuss in detail an advanced version of the draft. The developmental process was of great value to the partnership and has led to appreciable change in individuals' views. The draft policy presented here is intended to start the ball rolling, so that proper guidelines will be developed at whatever level in the NHS is most appropriate. Comments and feedback are welcomed.en
dc.formatArticleen
dc.languageenen
dc.sourceBRL:KIE/51214en
dc.subjectAge Factorsen
dc.subjectAlternativesen
dc.subjectAutonomyen
dc.subjectChronically Illen
dc.subjectDecision Makingen
dc.subjectDisclosureen
dc.subjectDoctorsen
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.subjectEthicistsen
dc.subjectFamily Practiceen
dc.subjectGuidelinesen
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectHealth Careen
dc.subjectIllnessen
dc.subjectJusticeen
dc.subjectLifeen
dc.subjectPatient Advocacyen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectPhysiciansen
dc.subjectPractice Guidelinesen
dc.subjectQuality Adjusted Life Yearsen
dc.subjectResource Allocationen
dc.subjectSelection for Treatmenten
dc.subjectTerminal Careen
dc.subjectValuesen
dc.titleThe Asbury Draft Policy on Ethical Use of Resourcesen
dc.provenanceDigital citation created by the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University for the BIOETHICSLINE database, part of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics' Bioethics Information Retrieval Project funded by the United States National Library of Medicine.en
dc.provenanceDigital citation migrated from OpenText LiveLink Discovery Server database named NBIO hosted by the Bioethics Research Library to the DSpace collection BioethicsLine hosted by Georgetown University.en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Georgetown University Seal
©2009—2022 Bioethics Research Library
Box 571212 Washington DC 20057-1212
202.687.3885