An Obligation to Provide Abortion Services: What Happens When Physicians Refuse?
Creator
Meyers, Christopher
Woods, Robert D.
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Medical Ethics. 1996 Apr; 22(2): 115-120.
Abstract
Access to abortion services in the United States continues to decline. It does so not because of significant changes in legislation or court rulings but because fewer and fewer physicians wish to perform abortions and because most states now have "conscientious objection" legislation that makes it easy for physicians to refuse to do so. We argue in this paper that physicians have an obligation to perform all socially sanctioned medical services, including abortions, and thus that the burden of justification lies upon those who wish to be excused from that obligation. That is, such persons should have to show how requiring them to perform abortions would represent a serious threat to their fundamental moral or religious beliefs. We use current California law as an example of legislation that does not take physicians' obligations into account and thus allows them too easily to declare conscientious objection.
Date
1996-04Subject
Abortion; Conscience; Cultural Pluralism; Education; Government; Government Financing; Government Regulation; Guidelines; Health; Health Services; Hospitals; Institutional Policies; Law; Legal Aspects; Legal Obligations; Legal Rights; Legislation; Medical Education; Moral Obligations; Moral Policy; Morality; Physicians; Public Hospitals; Public Policy; Refusal to Treat; Regulation; Rights; State Government; Women's Health; Women's Health Services;
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
An Obligation to Provide Abortion Services: What Happens When Physicians Refuse?
Meyers, Christopher; Woods, Robert D. (1996-04)