Five Points and a Lament About Range and Cotton's "Reports of Assent and Permission in Research With Children: Illustrations and Suggestions"
Roberts, Michael C.
Buckloh, Lisa M.
Ethics and Behavior. 1995; 5(4): 333-344.
This comment responds to an article by Range and Cotton (1995) on reporting of parental permission and child assent procedures in published articles for 4 psychology journals. Issue is taken with the assumptions, methodology, interpretations, and implications of listing researchers in the Range and Cotton article. There is no evidence researchers failed in their ethical obligations or that children were put at risk. Reporting permission/assent in publications is not an ethical requirement. Listing researchers as "failing" to do something not part of an ethical code is lamentable. Too many unfortunate implications and problems can be derived from Range and Cotton's analysis and conclusions.
Accountability; Age Factors; Behavioral Research; Children; Consent; Editorial Policies; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Evaluation; Evaluation Studies; Federal Government; Government; Government Regulation; Guidelines; Health; Informed Consent; Investigators; Literature; Minors; Misconduct; Organizations; Parental Consent; Professional Organizations; Psychology; Regulation; Research; Research Design; Research Ethics; Research Ethics Committees; Research Subjects; Researchers; Risk; Reporting; Survey;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Take Away Their Hammer: Logical and Ethical Problems in Range and Cotton's "Reports of Assent and Permission in Research With Children: Illustrations and Suggestions" Friman, Patrick C. (1995)Range and Cotton (1995) showed that many of the articles reviewed in their study did not include a line specifying institutional review board-approved procurement of informed parental permission and child assent for child ...