Take Away Their Hammer: Logical and Ethical Problems in Range and Cotton's "Reports of Assent and Permission in Research With Children: Illustrations and Suggestions"
Friman, Patrick C.
Ethics and Behavior. 1995; 5(4): 349-353.
Range and Cotton (1995) showed that many of the articles reviewed in their study did not include a line specifying institutional review board-approved procurement of informed parental permission and child assent for child research. Range and Cotton stated that the absence of the line suggests a lack of sensitivity to permission/assent issues, implied that many authors of the articles did not obtain permission/assent, and said those who did but did not report it were camouflaging those who did not. In this article, the logic of these points is refuted, the ethics of the Range and Cotton study are questioned, and its potential divisiveness is lamented.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Five Points and a Lament About Range and Cotton's "Reports of Assent and Permission in Research With Children: Illustrations and Suggestions" Roberts, Michael C.; Buckloh, Lisa M. (1995)This comment responds to an article by Range and Cotton (1995) on reporting of parental permission and child assent procedures in published articles for 4 psychology journals. Issue is taken with the assumptions, methodology, ...