The Non-Identity Problem and Genetic Harms -- the Case of Wrongful Handicaps
Brock, Dan W.
Bioethics. 1995 Jul; 9(3/4): 269-275.
The Human Genome Project will produce information permitting increasing opportunities to prevent genetically transmitted harms, most of which will be compatible with a life worth living, through avoiding conception or terminating a pregnancy. Failure to prevent these harms when it is possible for parents to do so without substantial burdens or costs to themselves or others are what I call "wrongful handicaps". Derek Parfit has developed a systematic difficulty for any such cases being wrongs -- when the harm could be prevented only by preventing the existence of the individual who would have a worthwhile life even with the handicap, then bringing him into existence with the handicap does not make him worse off and so does not wrong him. I argue that a non "person-affecting" principle requiring the avoidance of suffering and limited opportunity correctly accounts for cases of wrongful handicaps without requiring that the individuals with the handicap have been made worse off and therefore wronged. It is an advantage, not a difficulty, of this account that it does not imply that the person with the handicap has been wronged or is a victim with a special moral complaint.
Abortion; Beneficence; Children; Congenital Disorders; Counseling; Diagnosis; Genetic Disorders; Genome; Genetic Screening; Harm; Human Genome; Human Genome Project; Injuries; Life; Moral Policy; Parents; Personhood; Preconception Injuries; Prenatal Diagnosis; Pregnancy; Quality of Life; Reproduction; Selective Abortion; Suffering; Wrongful Life;
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Brock, Dan W. (1995-07)
McBrayer, Justin Patrick (2008-07)The non-identity problem is the problem of grounding moral wrongdoing in cases in which an action affects who will exist in the future. Consider a woman who intentionally conceives while on medication that is harmful for ...